Killer Whales Shouldn't be in Captivity
I have always been against animals in circuses, in amusement parks and any other place where they are held captive and made to perform. More often than not, they are exploited and abused in order to keep the show going so the owners can reap the profits. Jason Hribal wrote a compelling article on killer whales in amusement parks in this week’s edition of the online counterpunch.org, in which he describes the history of these animals in the captivity of these parks. He also describes the nature of killer whales – they live in a matriarchal society in their natural environment – and of course are used to the wide open spaces of the ocean, and not a confined tank. Hribal discusses in detail the lamentable stories of killer whales at Sea World, whereby they were forced to perform time and time again, although the whales had demonstrated a certain uncooperativeness, and at times aggression. But of course Sea World was determined to make its bucks off of these huge creatures, and so the show always went on.
Most people know of the recent tragedy at Sea World, in which a trainer was killed by a whale, that she had worked with. There are speculations that the whale was playing, or that he was distracted by her ponytail, or that he suddenly lost control. We’ll never know what exactly set him off. According to Hribal, killer whales have shown aggression towards their trainers in the past, and that includes the ones born in captivity. Trainers have really suffered serious injuries.
Personally, I think that when you put such a huge mammal in a giant fish tank, you are automatically asking for trouble. If this is not playing with fire, I don’t know what is. Most animals don’t belong in captivity. They don’t belong in a confined artificial environment for the amusement of the crowds. They get pissed sometimes, and when they do, and they are huge and powerful, then everyone should beware. Destroying the matriarchal society of the killer whales, putting them in a tank, making them do eight shows a day, 365 days a year, according to Hribal, is just plain cruel. It’s a circus like any other, and as such, it exploits animals. Hribal describes how other whales are killed when Sea World goes hunting for whales for its show. And it isn’t pretty. People, like the recent trainer who died, and others who have been seriously injured or died in the past, are also victims of this three ring circus that is Sea World, or other so called amusement parks that feature killer whales or other performing animals. It is a huge injustice against nature. These parks should close down, release the killer whales that can survive in the wild, and make sure that the ones that can’t survive find a decent home where they won’t have to be exploited for the entertainment of the crowds. It’s not Sea World for the animals, it is a Sea Prison.

The object of a spay and neuter program is to reduce the number animal, or in this case, dog population. With the reduction of the dog population there will obviously be less dogs roaming in packs. I imagine that Bulgarian authorities release the neutered and spayed dogs because they do not have enough dog shelters. If these same authorities had done something about the dog situation a long time ago this problem would not exist. I suspect that human beings who abandon their dogs are also to blame. In most poor countries such as Bulgaria humans traditionally exploit dogs by using them strictly as guard animals, and often times these animals lead miserable lives. Generally speaking the exploitation of dogs far outweighs the number of times that humans have been injured by them.
It is logical to deduce that the owners of the free range chickens will do their best to protect the chickens from predators and disease because they are in the business of selling these chickens. Eggs from free range chickens taste far better than factory farm chickens that have cooped up all their lives in miserable conditions and injected with hormones, that are passed on to humans. Most people feel better about eating eggs that came from a chicken that was humanely treated.
Animals were not put on this for the sole purpose of being exploited by humans. They are not objects. They feel pain, they are capable of forming bonds with each other and humans, they are capable of extraordinary affection, perception and courage, to name some of their qualities.
Posted by Anna Christina Peterpaul | April 4, 2012 3:29 PM
Treating animals humanely is a sign of a civilized society, without any exceptions. I am glad to see that Europeans are finally seeing the light in this regard. I lived in Europe for many years and was appalled at the cruelty to animals. This included ritualized torture of animals.
I only eat range free meat and chickens in order to diminish suffering. And I am not an elitist nor rich.
Your Bulgarian spaying and neutering program has to be fortified obviously, if you have packs of stray dogs wondering about.
I applaud the fact that range free eggs will be available at Easter. In order to make up for the lack of protein try eating more legumes, which are very cheap.
We live in a world where maltreatment of animals is pervasive and widespread, to say the least. You believe that it is a luxury to treat animals well. I say that to treat them well is a sign of compassion. Gandhi said that a society can be judged by the way it treats its animals.And one of central tenets of Buddhism is compassion for all creatures, meaning humans and animals.
Posted by Anna Christina Peterpaul | April 4, 2012 12:44 PM
Ms. Morra,
What an excellent article.
Silvio Berlusconi's regime shamefully objectifies women and has put Italian feminism into the dark ages. I lived in Italy for many years, and am so deeply disappointed by this turn of events.
Thank you for shedding light on this dire situation confronting Italian women.
Anna Christina
Posted by Anna Christina Peterpaul | November 19, 2010 3:25 PM
Hello Saba,
I really admire your passion and committement, in the face of such overwhelming forces.
In solidarity,
Anna Christina
Posted by Anna Christina Peterpaul | March 12, 2010 11:40 AM
Thanks for writing Annie. Just think what would happen if the public stopped attending whale shows at places like Sea World. They would be forced to shut down and would have to look elsewhere for a living - preferably making a living that is decent and humane.
Anna
Posted by Anna Christina Peterpaul | February 28, 2010 3:33 PM