Bay Area filmmaker Jonathan Parker’s latest feature (Untitled) captures the art world and all the accompanying pretensions at its funniest.
Adam Goldberg plays Adrian, a lovably grumpy avant-garde composer who lacks a fan base. That is until he meets ridiculously affected gallery owner Madeleine (Marley Shelton). Soon she’s his number one fan and promoter. But love, like trends, can be fleeting when the illusive next “big thing” is on the horizon.
Over email, Parker and I discussed low-budget filmmaking, the unforgettable taxidermy Madeleine shows in her gallery, and what inspired his sardonic take on art collecting.
(Untitled) is currently playing in theaters.
I really enjoyed the film, but I initially found the title rather confusing. Why did you title the film (Untitled)?
(Untitled) is the title of a lot of contemporary art works. You often see it on labels in museums and galleries, accompanied by the name of the artist and the year the work was created. There were a few suggestions to change the title due to the difficulty of searching online, but we had lived with it for several years and felt it had a certain elegance. I hope it is not too confusing.
What inspired you to write and direct a film that cleverly satirizes the art world, specifically what is considered art?
We started with the idea of Adam’s character – a difficult guy whose music is difficult. I spent many years as a musician (I got into film through music and have experienced many of the live performances depicted in the film), and wanted to do a story about a classically-trained composer who very seriously pursues music that is heard by very few. What keeps him going? Thomas Mann’s “Dr. Faustus” is about a similar character (also named Adrian) whose revolutionary musical theories are based on Arnold Schoenberg’s. It’s a character type you encounter not infrequently in that world. The difficult personality may be a self-defense mechanism masking a deep insecurity about whether their work has any merit or not.
We then set about contrasting the musician’s prospects (very little money) with those of a contemporary artist working in the moneyed world of contemporary art. I grew up in an artistic house. My mother, Gertrud Parker, is an artist and founded a small museum in San Francisco (Museum of Craft and Folk Art). But it was my college-age son’s pursuit of art and interest in contemporary art that got me going to a lot of galleries and art markets. I became curious (and somewhat annoyed) as to why wealthy collectors were spending so much on certain types of art and how the mysterious gallery system worked. I noticed a striking difference in the motivations of the collectors (social connections and investment) and the artists who created the works (loftier artistic goals). It struck me as a good comic set-up.
How did your own experiences as a musician and art collector contribute to writing (Untitled) with Catherine di Napoli? Specifically the idea that creating art and music for profit, or at least to make a living, is somehow less artistic than making art and music purely as creative pursuits.
I don’t agree that creating art for profit is less artistic than making it for purely creative reasons. I don’t think specific artists or musicians have much of a choice regarding that. One does what one does, and whether it’s profitable or not depends on the nature of the work. The amount of creative people who are fortunate enough to make a living from work that they would do anyway even if they were not getting paid for it is pretty small. That has never been my circumstance. I make a living from non-artistic pursuits.
What inspired Adrian’s (Adam Goldberg) compositions and the art shown at Madeleine’s (Marley Shelton) gallery? Do you have an interest in taxidermy?
The composer, David Lang, and I were parodying certain contemporary music compositions with Adam’s performances. These were augmented by Adam’s actual playing because it was the only way to shoot those scenes. Regarding the art, all of the pieces in the film are specific parodies of certain artists or conflations of multiple artists. Taxidermy, as a material, came about somewhat by accident because the young artist Kyle Ng, who I approached to make the Vinnie Jones character’s art, happened to have a taxidermy collection and his own private taxidermist. The concepts of most of those pieces were developed by my son, Sam Parker, and then executed by Kyle.
Adam Goldberg and Marley Shelton are very well cast and have great chemistry. How did both actors become involved with the film?
We approached Adam for the part not just for his acting ability but because of photographs I saw of him at a film festival looking extremely annoyed. It was the right countenance for Adrian. Adam then suggested Marley who he knew but had never worked with. The whole cast had excellent chemistry together, which is mostly just luck.
I had read that (Untitled) was made on a relatively small budget, and yet I found the film to be rather posh, particularly Madeleine’s clothing, gallery, and apartment. How did you achieve this tone on a smaller budget?
It wasn’t easy. Our DP, Svetlana Cvetko, obtained a very favorable deal from Panavision to use the Genesis HD camera, which had never been used on a low-budget show. We then decided to shoot in a wide-screen format to make it look more expensive. Marley’s personal stylist was able to obtain some of the high-end designer clothes gratis. The gallery is a set built in a Brooklyn warehouse. The art in her loft was made for the movie, very inexpensively, as parodies of actual pieces.
What is next for (Untitled) and for you as a filmmaker?
(Untitled) is rolling out to a number of big cities. It opened last week in the SF Bay Area, Washington DC, Dallas and others, and will open this weekend in Boston, Philly, Seattle, Atlanta, and the following week in Minneapolis and Houston. I’m heading to Germany tomorrow for its foreign festival premiere in Mannheim – Heidelberg.
Catherine and I are working on our next script which is set in the California Gold Rush. It’s kind of a comic version of There Will Be Blood.
I have been thinking a lot about the film, and what a good long life really means. Yesterday a close friend called me from upstate New York asking if I could pick her up from the airport and drive her to Santa Cruz. Her 92 year old grandma had been rushed to ICU and they weren’t sure how long she had to live. My friend booked a last minute flight to make the cross-country trip to see her grandma, maybe for the last time. The end of a loved one’s life, even someone in their nineties, is very difficult for the people left behind. And no one wants anyone to suffer. I feel as if the body’s natural instinct is to keep fighting to live, and at some point that just isn’t possible. But no, I would not want to live for 500 years. It just seems too exhausting! I agree with the idea that knowing that life does end motivates you to make things happen. I will be turning 30 in the fall, and a few months ago I had a moment of panic and thought “I have six months to get my life together. Six months.” As if turning 30 was some sort of an ending point, as opposed to a new beginning. The reality that we don’t have forever helps, me at least, set goals, make priorities, and try to make the most of each day.
Posted by JessicaMosby | July 12, 2011 2:13 AM
Again, thank you for your comment.
I would just to clarify a few points: 1. I have been to a number of other film festivals. 2. I would never review a film that I walked out of; however, one should never spoil the ending of a film in their review. 3. At Sundance, as with the other festivals I’ve attended, you only have to arrive at Press and Industry screenings 5 to 10 minutes before the screening begins to check-in and take your seat. 4. At Sundance, all of the Press and Industry screenings are at the Yarrow and Holiday (at most a two minute walk between venues), and there are generally three films screening simultaneously. So, it is possible to leave a film only to walk for two minutes to another screening.
And I think everyone is against using cell phones during screenings, in addition to talking and arriving late.
I appreciate your comments, but I feel that you have misconstrued my post and comment. I love films (hence I saw 21 films at this year’s Sundance film festival). But I don’t think that walking out of a film is the worst thing in the world.
Posted by JessicaMosby | January 26, 2009 2:00 PM
I must, very respectfully, disagree with your comment. I think it is completely fine to walk out of a film if you’re not enjoying it, especially at film festivals where you can then see another (hopefully better) film. I don’t think that leaving a film represents a “selfishness and ‘screw you, me first’ attitude.” Every film is not going to be universally liked by everyone.
Also, I was specifically referring to Press and Industry screening (for the record, at almost every Press and Industry I attended at least a few people walked out), which never have a post-screening Q&A with the cast and director. I personally think it would be very rude to ask a director during the Q&A why their film was terrible.
I have a great love and respect for everyone involved with film festivals, particularly Sundance. The best thing that someone can do during (and after) attending a film festival is to tell people about the amazing art they watched – and that doesn’t happen if you force yourself to suffer through films you don’t like.
Posted by JessicaMosby | January 24, 2009 10:34 PM
A week after our historic presidential election, PBS (as part of Frontline) will be broadcasting Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story.
Posted by JessicaMosby | November 11, 2008 2:22 PM
If you would like more information about the film and the filmmaker, here is a great interview with Joanna Rudnick on Talk of the Nation. Please note, the interview does include a few spoilers.
Posted by JessicaMosby | October 6, 2008 5:15 AM
I am happy to report that Up the Yangtze will be on PBS as part of the POV series on October 8.
I was happy to hear that people who saw the film were so moved that they want to help Cindy Yu Shui's family. If you're interested in helping, you can give her family money through this website.
Posted by JessicaMosby | July 27, 2008 9:16 PM
I really enjoyed reading this article! Your analysis of different international recruiting and training styles is very interesting, especially considering the upcoming summer Olympics!
Posted by JessicaMosby | May 13, 2008 11:09 AM
This is such an inspiring story! Thank you!
Posted by JessicaMosby | May 9, 2008 4:12 PM
This is such an important article, especially in an election year when everyone and anyone goes on the record touting their health care solutions!
I'm wondering how your vision is now? Will you have to undergo more surgeries in the future?
Posted by JessicaMosby | April 8, 2008 6:22 PM
The Grannies are indeed inspiring ladies! Thank you for this post!
Posted by JessicaMosby | March 19, 2008 9:46 PM