Is it not easier to objectify somebody who looks like an object (specifically, a tent) rather than a human? Changing one's dress to accommodate men seems like a sign of weakness rather than strength. Most men in this country are not animals who cannot control themselves in the presence of a woman's face. Covering one's face in the US is ultimately shutting oneself off from the community. As long as safety is not being compromised (which is a real issue here) then I think it should be a woman's right to wear what she wants, but it is also my right to think it is unnecessary, if not ridiculous.
Is it not easier to objectify somebody who looks like an object (specifically, a tent) rather than a human? Changing one's dress to accommodate men seems like a sign of weakness rather than strength. Most men in this country are not animals who cannot control themselves in the presence of a woman's face. Covering one's face in the US is ultimately shutting oneself off from the community. As long as safety is not being compromised (which is a real issue here) then I think it should be a woman's right to wear what she wants, but it is also my right to think it is unnecessary, if not ridiculous.
Posted by glowingheart77 | June 24, 2010 8:50 AM